🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," said one European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.